Our point here is not whether these models in general actually apply, nor is it whether transmission occurs, nor is it whether viruses exist and cause disease... The point is that Fisman et al. (2022, 2024) concocted an invalid parameter to argue that the unvaccinated are a menace; and that we can rigorously prove that their parameter is fabricated and false. They did this in their second paper (2024) even after being clearly told after their first paper (2022). The Fisman et al. work on this is an example of "hate science": false science used to target a group (h/t Regina Watteel).
Thank you for all the work that went into this. I feel exasperated how many good scientists go to great lengths, usually at great risk, to disprove faulty science that has resulted in significant damage to individuals and society, with little admission and/or change in behavior. It's as if all the truth reports are just noise in the music of the powerful. We desperately need more courageous individuals to stand up in whatever walk of life to denounce narratives based upon false information. Thank you Denis for being one of those!
Hey, thanks! Co-author and brilliant interdisciplinary scientist Joseph Hickey lost his professional data scientist job at the Bank of Canada for refusing the vaccine and speaking his mind... He has documented his battle, which continues.
Don't you realize that these studies are funded to lie? They control all these estates.
First they should demonstrate that those who have not been injected are the ones who are dying, and on the contrary, anyone who has been injected with anything in the last 6 years is in danger of dying. Of course, they only count those vaccinated against covid, but they ignore those who are not vaccinated against covid and have been injected with something. They would fall into the vaccinated group.
Why do I say this? because it doesn't matter what you inject, they all have graphene inside
This is why “they” (the drug pushers) say “trust the science” and not to do your own research. Because if you do, their faulty claims will be unearthed.
I recently had “words” with a local congressman. I told him no one with half a brain trusts “the science”, nor public health anymore. He is retiring. Good riddance.
The scientific method is nearly passé, thanks to the likes of professional "scientists" like Vannevar Bush. I can trust very few "scientific" publications, which tends to limit me to my own research and experience.
Of course, when you look into the microscope and see what you find, is anyone going to trust politicians, science, health? And it is the governments and the False Dissidence that are denying what we all see under the microscope. Therefore, this shows you that we must question everything we were taught
I wish I could look under a microscope and see it for myself. There is a lot of supposed information, some of which does not make sense. I used to go in and out of labs suited up like an astronaut when I determined the overhead rate for federally-sponsored research so I never bought into the notion of cloth masks or social distancing, or lockdowns for that matter. I was in AIDS labs at USC and various bio labs throughout the US. I knew enough from that experience not to trust “the science” as attempts were made to coerce me to falsify data so I had to leave that career. I am seeing and hearing about embolisms, cancers, deaths, etc. in those whom I cautioned against EUA “vaccines”. Not all but far too many so I would like to know exactly what was in the vials. I do, in fact, question everything I was taught. I have had to unlearn and relearn much.
The False Dissidence has done harm with all this, because it is interested in not knowing the truth, But when dozens of doctors, scientists in various parts of the world, who have published their findings, with the two reports of Dr. Campra ( 2021), it's because they've seen it. It's not a matter of believing, it's a matter of seeing, see for yourself.
What is not credible are those who do not have evidence, defend something without having looked under the microscope, for example, those who defend mRNA, the spike, the virus, spider webs, polymers, etc., without having done any analysis.
Since they have put graphene in the vials and the governments, the media and the False Dissidence deny it, we must come to the conclusion of questioning everything they taught us. We have been saying this since 2021.
The "professional educators" told my mother, don't teach your children to read because it will interfere with us teaching them professionally. She didn't, and they didn't. Sure glad I got a teacher in second grade, at a different school, who didn't buy into that nonsense.
Miss Brown (first grade) made a big show of Dick and Jane, and Run Dick Run, for all the good it didn't do. I'm still puzzled why she recited the names of acids in various fruits, but didn't bother with the sounds of letters and diphthongs.
I think you're right. I also had Dick, Jane and Sally, but really didn't grasp reading until perhaps 2nd grade--I from a family voracious readers. Once i had gotten "literate" I was off and running. Made an alphabet song for my toddlers (A has two sounds, ah and ay, B has buh.....)
My mother - opera-trained and with the most warming and beautiful singing voice I've ever heard - and previously an English teacher since graduating Normal College at 15 to start teaching kids larger than she was - used to read to me, moving her finger under each word as she spoke it. And she'd explain every word I didn't understand, until I was old enough to look them up myself, in the huge, heavy Webster's dictionary.
That being how I managed to learn to read books before kindergarten...
Parents these days mostly don't have that period home with their small children - which also might drive them a bit bonkers, now and then, lol.
Reminds me of the Scientological suggestion, when you encounter an unfamiliar word, look it up and find what it mean before continuing. Auctioneers bothered me because I thought their patter should mean something. It was just filler noise.
Professor Rancourt, would you appear on my medical freedom dedicated radio show -- The Bassline, to discuss this? It appears on the Progressive Radio Network every Friday at 1pm EST. My audience is astute and my guests are tremendous:
Flippin adore Rancourt's work along with a small handful who are truly debunking lies told to create the illusion of a pandemic.. another amazing guest is neurobiologist Jay Couey who teaches the biology and you can send an email or get his office number from Gigaohm site. I'll add a few different show links to better choose your flavor deep science or not. If you tell him Pamela Drew sent you he will know you've been vetted & it's a calendar question! <3
Snotty dismissive snark is never a good look Skippy. I've been tracking biotech since 1997 and vaccine-virus black hole seriously since Gardasil & read my share of studies across the decades.. listened to countless knowledgeable sources & heap of BS along the way. Jay is the first in over 20 years to tackle the foundational biology and he's brilliant at it. To dismiss what you can't know with certainty is flaunting smugnorance in my book.
No it does not go both ways. Being uncertain about things that may be possible is nothing like certainty they do not exist at all with the onus on others to prove you wrong. This is a time wasting exercise.. pass thanks!
How does the mRNA get out of lipids that are designed to not break down?
The mRNA, pseudo whatever, and spike protein stuff is there to cover up for the fact that the lipids were always a problem and the reason why they were used despite being huge failures in 2017 and earlier.
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
I'm not worried much about it in food. The digestive system stops a lot of things from getting absorbed. There's a lot of filtration of what's absorbed.
Injection is where a lot of things can cause damage because it's unfiltered and can directly interfere with circulation or cell processes.
As for nicotine, I've heard of benefits of it for a long time. I remember they were investigating it as a cure for ebola.
The lung cancer is likely from the chemicals they add to cigarettes. I smoke natural tobacco. It's called "pipe tobacco" to have less taxes, lol.
The tubes and the machine to inject the tobacco is easy to find and they use cotton filters, not the fiberglass that we get in the USA.
Math isn't my subject but if mRNA transfection provided immunity, what everyone else does has no impact or what's the point of taking the jab if it's not protection. No p values or Psi required!! :~)
Odd, since they threw this rot at me in 2021. Said I needed to get a covid shot even though I'd recovered from covid in March 2020. Claimed "vaccine immunity" more robust than recovered. I gather because the continuing mRNA spike storm maintains obsolete antibody levels, since they think immunity is only antibodies.
The shape of letter psi resembles a demonic fork. It was also used to denote Pseudouridine used in the mRNA shots. These demons have no shame or scruples, scientific or otherwise. And the normies remain totally clueless.
If you changed "bad science" to "false knowledge" we would agree, although we would not be using the words the same way. This entire phenomenon has little to do with reason in the positive sense and everything to do with reason in the sense of faulty human reason at it worst. And this faultiness is not limited to scientists -- it knows no bounds.
Approach the thing reasonably if you must, but I wonder if you realize what it is that you are approaching. It is nasty beyond belief.
Our point here is not whether these models in general actually apply, nor is it whether transmission occurs, nor is it whether viruses exist and cause disease... The point is that Fisman et al. (2022, 2024) concocted an invalid parameter to argue that the unvaccinated are a menace; and that we can rigorously prove that their parameter is fabricated and false. They did this in their second paper (2024) even after being clearly told after their first paper (2022). The Fisman et al. work on this is an example of "hate science": false science used to target a group (h/t Regina Watteel).
Thank you for all the work that went into this. I feel exasperated how many good scientists go to great lengths, usually at great risk, to disprove faulty science that has resulted in significant damage to individuals and society, with little admission and/or change in behavior. It's as if all the truth reports are just noise in the music of the powerful. We desperately need more courageous individuals to stand up in whatever walk of life to denounce narratives based upon false information. Thank you Denis for being one of those!
Hey, thanks! Co-author and brilliant interdisciplinary scientist Joseph Hickey lost his professional data scientist job at the Bank of Canada for refusing the vaccine and speaking his mind... He has documented his battle, which continues.
Follow our science work at: https://substack.com/@correlationresearch?utm_source=about-page
Don't you realize that these studies are funded to lie? They control all these estates.
First they should demonstrate that those who have not been injected are the ones who are dying, and on the contrary, anyone who has been injected with anything in the last 6 years is in danger of dying. Of course, they only count those vaccinated against covid, but they ignore those who are not vaccinated against covid and have been injected with something. They would fall into the vaccinated group.
Why do I say this? because it doesn't matter what you inject, they all have graphene inside
This is why “they” (the drug pushers) say “trust the science” and not to do your own research. Because if you do, their faulty claims will be unearthed.
I recently had “words” with a local congressman. I told him no one with half a brain trusts “the science”, nor public health anymore. He is retiring. Good riddance.
The scientific method is nearly passé, thanks to the likes of professional "scientists" like Vannevar Bush. I can trust very few "scientific" publications, which tends to limit me to my own research and experience.
Of course, when you look into the microscope and see what you find, is anyone going to trust politicians, science, health? And it is the governments and the False Dissidence that are denying what we all see under the microscope. Therefore, this shows you that we must question everything we were taught
I wish I could look under a microscope and see it for myself. There is a lot of supposed information, some of which does not make sense. I used to go in and out of labs suited up like an astronaut when I determined the overhead rate for federally-sponsored research so I never bought into the notion of cloth masks or social distancing, or lockdowns for that matter. I was in AIDS labs at USC and various bio labs throughout the US. I knew enough from that experience not to trust “the science” as attempts were made to coerce me to falsify data so I had to leave that career. I am seeing and hearing about embolisms, cancers, deaths, etc. in those whom I cautioned against EUA “vaccines”. Not all but far too many so I would like to know exactly what was in the vials. I do, in fact, question everything I was taught. I have had to unlearn and relearn much.
The False Dissidence has done harm with all this, because it is interested in not knowing the truth, But when dozens of doctors, scientists in various parts of the world, who have published their findings, with the two reports of Dr. Campra ( 2021), it's because they've seen it. It's not a matter of believing, it's a matter of seeing, see for yourself.
What is not credible are those who do not have evidence, defend something without having looked under the microscope, for example, those who defend mRNA, the spike, the virus, spider webs, polymers, etc., without having done any analysis.
Since they have put graphene in the vials and the governments, the media and the False Dissidence deny it, we must come to the conclusion of questioning everything they taught us. We have been saying this since 2021.
The "professional educators" told my mother, don't teach your children to read because it will interfere with us teaching them professionally. She didn't, and they didn't. Sure glad I got a teacher in second grade, at a different school, who didn't buy into that nonsense.
Precisely why I (public school teacher) chose to teach my children to read, and to do basic arithmetic before kindergarten.
Miss Brown (first grade) made a big show of Dick and Jane, and Run Dick Run, for all the good it didn't do. I'm still puzzled why she recited the names of acids in various fruits, but didn't bother with the sounds of letters and diphthongs.
I think you're right. I also had Dick, Jane and Sally, but really didn't grasp reading until perhaps 2nd grade--I from a family voracious readers. Once i had gotten "literate" I was off and running. Made an alphabet song for my toddlers (A has two sounds, ah and ay, B has buh.....)
My mother - opera-trained and with the most warming and beautiful singing voice I've ever heard - and previously an English teacher since graduating Normal College at 15 to start teaching kids larger than she was - used to read to me, moving her finger under each word as she spoke it. And she'd explain every word I didn't understand, until I was old enough to look them up myself, in the huge, heavy Webster's dictionary.
That being how I managed to learn to read books before kindergarten...
Parents these days mostly don't have that period home with their small children - which also might drive them a bit bonkers, now and then, lol.
Reminds me of the Scientological suggestion, when you encounter an unfamiliar word, look it up and find what it mean before continuing. Auctioneers bothered me because I thought their patter should mean something. It was just filler noise.
With Critical thinking and Logical reasoning NOT being taught in Schools,only Sheep, who believe the Govt. BS are being created...
And that Folks, is a chapter and verse dismantling of amateurish attempt at science fraud we are in the Age of Scientific Schlock
Thanks for your courage and tenacity! Fisman represents the propaganda science wing, and he and his ilk should be at Nuremberg 2 trials.
There was no pandemic, there was a Bioweapon to maim and kill .
That's right, you just need to look under the microscope
Without a doubt ….. yes !!! So glad I didn’t take it
Professor Rancourt, would you appear on my medical freedom dedicated radio show -- The Bassline, to discuss this? It appears on the Progressive Radio Network every Friday at 1pm EST. My audience is astute and my guests are tremendous:
https://thebassline.podbean.com/
Keep up the great work.
Flippin adore Rancourt's work along with a small handful who are truly debunking lies told to create the illusion of a pandemic.. another amazing guest is neurobiologist Jay Couey who teaches the biology and you can send an email or get his office number from Gigaohm site. I'll add a few different show links to better choose your flavor deep science or not. If you tell him Pamela Drew sent you he will know you've been vetted & it's a calendar question! <3
***Main site w contact info, published papers, etc https://gigaohmbiological.com/
Rumble Archive... lots to choose from by title
https://rumble.com/c/GigaohmBiologicalArchive
Chat w Denis Rancourt - https://rumble.com/v3oo589-2023-10-10-denis-rancourt-phd-10-oct-2023-brief-twitch1947878197.html
Chat w Mike Yeadon - https://rumble.com/v3i6jzs-2023-09-08-mike-yeadon-aka-mr.-sparkle-8-sept-2023.html
Gigaohm for Rumble live feeds 2024 launch
https://rumble.com/user/GigaohmBiological
Doesn’t Jay Couey still believe in viruses? I think the conversation has moved on a bit since then…
Snotty dismissive snark is never a good look Skippy. I've been tracking biotech since 1997 and vaccine-virus black hole seriously since Gardasil & read my share of studies across the decades.. listened to countless knowledgeable sources & heap of BS along the way. Jay is the first in over 20 years to tackle the foundational biology and he's brilliant at it. To dismiss what you can't know with certainty is flaunting smugnorance in my book.
'To dismiss what you can't know with certainty is flaunting smugnorance in my book. "
That goes both ways.
Please show all here how one isolated the SARS-CoV-2 "virus".
There has been an epidemiologist that put up $1 million to anyone that can isolate the CoVid1984. And no takers.
Not that prize money brings out good science but somehow all these entitled virologists are avoiding the challenge.
Do you have an idea why that is so?
Can you show to everyone here a paper that shoes isolation and culturing of SARS-CoV-2.
No it does not go both ways. Being uncertain about things that may be possible is nothing like certainty they do not exist at all with the onus on others to prove you wrong. This is a time wasting exercise.. pass thanks!
Please show an example of the isolation of SARS-CoV-2.
No? Then it DOES go both ways.
You are wasting EVERYONE'S TIME including your own.
Don't pollute this space to the detriment of others.
You just have another subscriber to your podcast!
Thank you! Please tune in today at 1pm EST on PRN.live -- my guest is John Beaudoin. Also, please subscribe to my medical freedom dedicated Substack:
https://open.substack.com/pub/jeremiahhosea/p/hats-off-to-the-ol-school-anti-vaxxers?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=15brfd
N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) to decrease immunogenicity of the RNA. Oh the irony, sigh.
Yeah it's full of bs!
How does the mRNA get out of lipids that are designed to not break down?
The mRNA, pseudo whatever, and spike protein stuff is there to cover up for the fact that the lipids were always a problem and the reason why they were used despite being huge failures in 2017 and earlier.
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
" pseudo whatever, and spike protein stuff "- cool!
There is a claim that spike proteins are not in fond of nicotine so I've quit quitting smoking, although I'm not vaccinated but in case my food is.
But what about lipids??
I'm not worried much about it in food. The digestive system stops a lot of things from getting absorbed. There's a lot of filtration of what's absorbed.
Injection is where a lot of things can cause damage because it's unfiltered and can directly interfere with circulation or cell processes.
As for nicotine, I've heard of benefits of it for a long time. I remember they were investigating it as a cure for ebola.
The lung cancer is likely from the chemicals they add to cigarettes. I smoke natural tobacco. It's called "pipe tobacco" to have less taxes, lol.
The tubes and the machine to inject the tobacco is easy to find and they use cotton filters, not the fiberglass that we get in the USA.
I make my own - $1 a pack :-}
2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic US (Wiki)
Species: Zaire ebolavirus
Reported number of cases: 4
Reported number of deaths and percentage of fatal cases: 1
Years ago my daughter was on AIDS mission in Sub-saharan Africa -- just poverty... and experimental field for new vaccines.
And, for years already,I'm waiting for a true scientific proof that viruses exist -- still waiting...
Years ago it was shown that there was no mRNA, therefore spike
Years ago it was proven that there was no mRNA in vaccines, don't you know?
I offer my sincere thanks Prof Rancourt, and I would hope, from most of the People here in Australia as well. Thank Goodness for Peope like you Sir,
What Fisman proved is also quite valuable.. there's no shortage of funding for deceptive studies!
These bullshit scientists and mathematicians keep on inventing more crap to prove their imagination.
Heinz von Foerester on how science became "systemics".
https://youtu.be/ev7e9sfWIJo
This applies to physics too where the big bang theory and quantum theory are both big on ASSuming things.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkdAkAC4ItcHNLDIK9ORydQl_Ik6GJ0bD
Math isn't my subject but if mRNA transfection provided immunity, what everyone else does has no impact or what's the point of taking the jab if it's not protection. No p values or Psi required!! :~)
Odd, since they threw this rot at me in 2021. Said I needed to get a covid shot even though I'd recovered from covid in March 2020. Claimed "vaccine immunity" more robust than recovered. I gather because the continuing mRNA spike storm maintains obsolete antibody levels, since they think immunity is only antibodies.
like a one trick pony
It has already been proven that there is no mRNA in vaccines, so breathe easy as this proves that there is no virus
Unless this is sarcasm, (Did you forget to close with /s?), get your meds refilled.
I wasn't expecting an intelligent response, I was expecting an attack as usually happens with these types of people.
No time for deluded nutcases. Bye!
two neuron argument
Sounds like a psi-op to me!
The shape of letter psi resembles a demonic fork. It was also used to denote Pseudouridine used in the mRNA shots. These demons have no shame or scruples, scientific or otherwise. And the normies remain totally clueless.
If you changed "bad science" to "false knowledge" we would agree, although we would not be using the words the same way. This entire phenomenon has little to do with reason in the positive sense and everything to do with reason in the sense of faulty human reason at it worst. And this faultiness is not limited to scientists -- it knows no bounds.
Approach the thing reasonably if you must, but I wonder if you realize what it is that you are approaching. It is nasty beyond belief.
Interesting that Fisman chose a satanic pitchfork to represent his fraudulent papers. Likely intentional.