48 Comments
Nov 20Liked by Denis Rancourt

True enough and why tax payers didn't get to see the invoices.

Expand full comment

I worked on a super yacht years ago. Ww regularly sailed through the Suez Canal to the Maldives. Ship owners pay very large sums of money for insurance agsinst pirates. Then we also joined a navy convoy to ptotect us. I dont know the cost to join this convoy but its not cheap. Here is the thing. The worlds Navies could obliterate these pirates but why dont they. I reckon they rather support them "under cover" to keep the threat perpetual. Similar story right?

Expand full comment

Agree Denis - Climate and Covid are the two greatest scams of our Age.

PROOF:

THE CULL TRILOGY – by Allan Malcolm MacRae

"The ability to correctly predict is the best objective measure of scientific and technical competence."

1. MURDER OF MULTITUDES

Covid & Climate Chronicles – The Big Cull

https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0CHR2Z38J

2. THE CLIMATE SCAM

Fifty Years of False Fears

https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0CK1ZZY7T

3. THE CORRUPTION OF OUR INSTITUTIONS

The New Dark Age

https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0CLVVW54G

Regards, Allan MacRae, Calgary

Expand full comment

Well said. Have been thinking the same thing for the past four years, at least. But not just MRNA vaccines, all vaccines, are a protection racket. It is not the job of medicine to ''protect'' healthy people from anything. Their job is so cure the sick. As long as people are healthy then they have no need of any doctors or any medicine. Vaccination is a smart way to convert the healthy into the sick and profit by it endlessly - just like a protection racket. A smart way to get doctors, and hangers on, constantly pushing and profiting from drugs.

Expand full comment
Nov 20Liked by Denis Rancourt

When I try to click on your link, substack makes it disappear!

I have to leave the comments and come back again to see the link, the again I click and it disappears... as if you didn't write anything.

Substack is part of the system :/

Expand full comment

I have heard this from others. I believe that it is censorship via personalized algorithms. Try again.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2024/11/investigative-reports/get-ready-for-the-republican-carbon-market/

Expand full comment
19 hrs agoLiked by Denis Rancourt

Ask Bill Ghate$ about protection rackets.

He ran/runs a great one at MS.

Expand full comment
author

Great point. Internet protection from the miners of our online lives.

Expand full comment
21 hrs ago·edited 21 hrs agoLiked by Denis Rancourt

I might need a gun to stop the vaccinazis from trying to inject their poisons into me. Think about the last fake pandemic, that of covid, as it was possible for the murdering anti-human scum to inject billions with possibly poison mRNA crap. No way will guns accomplish that as far as murder goes.

Protection rackets are the sweet spots for the government where honesty is never required to garner mountains of power and control.

Expand full comment

The mafia could only dream of such a deal- "legal" protection, blackmail, and murder, enabled by bought-and-paid-for US legislators. A racket run through the US Dept. of Defense and Intel agencies.

Expand full comment
13 hrs agoLiked by Denis Rancourt

Not to mention the ability to *force* people to buy/take their products! It's unreal!

Expand full comment
Nov 20Liked by Denis Rancourt

For those who are interested in the German RKI-leak and cannot follow the inadequate, machine generated subtitles on the video here is our improved English transcript.

http://docs.shortxxvids.com/docs/2024/Nov/rki_leak_video_transcript_homburg.pdf

Expand full comment
23 hrs agoLiked by Denis Rancourt

2023 DOD Budget: $816 billion

2023 HHS Budget: $1.7 trillion

Expand full comment

And that's only part of it for each.

The entire US military expenditures exceed $1.3 trillion. The entire US "health management system " is currently a bit over $4 trillion.

Expand full comment
13 hrs agoLiked by Denis Rancourt

Michael Corleone was right! The conversation he has in Godfather II with the Senator is incredible. Our government bros are the baddest badasses on the planet. I'm not sure it's not necessary in the world we live in. Was Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men also right? Understanding the money flows, where the money went, and whose coffers have to be topped off or else all hell breaks loose, is partly what Epstein was doing, apparently. It's a dark and powerful world out there on the high seas with a lot of collateral damage, to say the least.

Expand full comment

I hadn't put it in those terms before, although yes, of course, thanks for the clarity. I noticed that RFK Jr, Casey Means, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy and Tucker Carlson have each made this point about pharma advertising recently. Amazingly, even defense companies occasionally place tv ads, Fox Kennedy said, despite the fact that no individual can purchase what they sell. Yes, obviously this is protection money to the media companies, although I imagine there is also a tremendous mind control effect from hearing constantly about drugs that cause horrific disease and death ("side effects") and being told they are "medicine".

Expand full comment
founding

Get a gun...shoot your t.v. Or if you can't do that...get a dvd machine and only watch wonderful old movies that portray a human world....life as it was before the attack of the c*vid zombies and the victims of the great VAX WARS.

I love old movies. Also read. I never look at "news" shows...they are all liars. I have some blogs I check regularly like COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE, THE BREGGINS, truthcomestolight.com

Denis Rancourt doesn't write much...but when he does he blows everyone else out of the water. Whenever I am trying to convince people that YES...WE DID EXPERIENCE AN ATTACK BY GLOBAL POWER VAMPIRES...I show them the graphs that Denis made of excess death etc. We actually do live in "interesting times".

Expand full comment

Yup, agreed. Glad you know the same. Haven’t had a television for twenty years and haven’t consulted mainstream news for “facts” for thirty or so years. As a truth seeker, I do take in an insane amount of information though… it would be nice to watch more fun stuff ;) although I just rely on nature for my joy. Long walks in South Africa is my current gift of Life.

Expand full comment

Been doing this for years now. I saw the way TV was headed years ago and began collecting classic TV and movies. I don't subscribe to any kind of cable or streaming. Another benefit of having my own library is I don't *ever* see any of the foul advertising for anything (shots, pills, junk food, garbage!). The only bad thing for people who are aware of what's going on in the world, is that in a *lot* of the older TVs and Movies, you can see the predictive programming. They've been working on us for decades!!!

Expand full comment

Oh, yes, now that you mention advertising, I recall that was my primary issue in the early days. I refused to watch it and did everything to get around it. (When TV was on in my house when married cuz husband liked having it on, I always turned sound down so he could look over at sports but dang, I couldn't handle the ads.) Early days of internet had a lot of that, too, as magazines just moved their content online and brought flashing ads with it - maybe they still do, but i've long worked things so I can get directly to info with minimal ad interference. And, wow, interesting point about the early predictive programming - hadn't thought about that but yeah, of course. As a whole, we were so naive back in the day - yikes.

Expand full comment

Yep, and they knew the platform for these shots caused issues way before con-vid or mRNA. There's even a study where myocarditis happened without mRNA or "spike protein".

https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein

Similar times when they took a purposely shitty failed drug in order to create issues;

-HIV, failed toxic chemo drug AZT which has the same side effects as AIDS, death.

-Polio vaccines which sometimes gave people transverse myelitis which are basically polio symptoms.

-Remdesevir, one of the most dangerous drugs for ebola, used to "cure" con-vid. I think they threw that one in to widen the "novel coronavirus" symptoms, with people getting kidney failure they could blame it on con-vid.

Expand full comment

Vaccines are a necessary protection racket:

Why are they Poisoning the Herd?

Clearly the Men Who Run the World are aware that diets high in sugar and carbohydrates destroy the human body. They know that statins are no solution to the diseases caused by these diets. They know seed oils should not be consumed by humans. They definitely understand that their food pyramid is a colossal lie.

And they know that vaccines are also dramatically reducing life spans.

Many will argue that the food and pharma industries are benefitting from these outcomes. They make billions of dollars off of addicting humans to these health-destroying inputs and even more from treating the inevitable diseases that result from bad diets.

I disagree that this was inevitable and I would argue that this is all part of a plan, a necessary plan.

The Men Who Run the World and their minions have the ability to stop this. All they would have to do is employ some of the same strategies that were used to convince 6 billion to inject a deadly vaccine. They could easily crush demand for sugary drinks and processed foods by pounding them with high taxes.

We have seen how governments are capable of ending the addiction to tobacco. Why not do the same for sugary foods. I would argue that they decided to come down hard on smoking because it was killing people too quickly and damaging productivity on their farm. They did not make tobacco the enemy because they love ya’ll.

Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?

Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.

Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.

All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.

Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?

You are Expendable

At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.

They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.

Without these wise decisions by the Men Who Run the World to deploy strategies to cull the herd, the global economy would have collapsed years ago under the dead weight of too many geriatrics.

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control

I know most people will - despite being unable to argue against this --- be unable to accept this.

Most humans have a difficult time with changing their minds on something .... and I suppose accepting the above... leads to despair?

Expand full comment

Which Option Do You Prefer?

When it comes to controlling population

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/which-option-do-you-prefer

Option 1: introduce a Culling Lottery. When you reach 70 years of age, provided you are relatively healthy, you receive a lottery ticket. One of out ten is a winner. The losers are put down.

Option 2: introduce mass vaccination, make sugar ubiquitous in food products, and encourage the consumption of processed foods ensuring that most people do not live much past 70.

Why do we not want a population that is top heavy with elderly citizens?

This would be a disaster because a high proportion of our limited resources would need to be allocated to supporting the elderly, and they contribute nothing.

Resources that could be used to operate good schools, hospitals, infrastructure and so on, would instead go to medical care, free bus passes, old age homes, pensions and other support for the huge army of geriatrics.

The Men Who Run the World were forced to make a decision.

They went with Option 2.

I might add... this is why democracy would be a bad thing... if given these two options the barnyard animals would demand a 3rd option ... let everyone live long lives.... don't cull... don't poison them...

And guess what would happen?

Expand full comment

Rather than rant and demand changes that will NEVER happen .. that should NOT happen...

Instead worry about Number Uno... and follow this https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/a-near-fool-proof-cure-for-cancer

Eat zero processed foods (try The 21 Day Challenge)

Eat zero sugar (read The Case Against Sugar)

Do not eat seed oils

Do not smoke and consume minimal alcohol

Stop buying ‘stuff’ and instead use the money to buy organic food as often as possible. Beware of the Dirty Dozen

Eat a wide variety of whole foods avoiding high carb foods such as bread and pasta (read The Clot Thickens)

Take supplements

Get plenty of sleep (read Why We Sleep)

Exercise

Reduce stress and anxiety by delegating and adopting a not giving f789s about anything. And if life becomes too difficult you can always off yourself. I am not suggesting you do that but if you have that option in your back pocket, that will help you not give f789s.

And last but not least, do not inject Rat Juice.

Nah... too hard... f789 Big Pharma... greedy bastards... spend all your energy on hating them... and nothing on FIXING YOUR FAT ASSES.

Stop hating pharma... they are only giving ya'll WHAT YOU WANT https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/we-need-to-stop-hating-big-pharma

Expand full comment
founding

I agree with a lot of what you say. They same people who destroyed your health for money certainly will not "fix it" again. It's really not that hard to stop eating sugar, seed oil, and poison additives. Just eat a lot of other stuff and you won't even want to eat the poison. I do take supplements but not many...LIFE EXTENSION is one brand I use. I drink fresh pressed carrot juice and when I do "indulge" in bad food--I use enemas. Sounds awful but it is a simple procedure that does detoxify. I am 74, never sick, can (and do} walk miles and have a regular yoga practice as well care for a blind totally disabled spouse. It sounds hard, but when you aren't totally poisoned all the time...living the good life is a lot easier then when you have sugar hang overs, are arthritic and hurt all over. People marvel at my health and vitality. I don't bother preaching about my health practices because they wouldn't believe me anyway.....

I DO hate pharma. The little babies and children that are getting these "c*vid" vaccines do not want them. And people who needed to keep their jobs to feed their families did NOT WANT THESE SHOTS...they were forced on them. You make good points though, thanks. .

Expand full comment

Fast Eddy,

There's some logic to what you say but you are surely batting for the other team and pushing their agenda.

If this were my Substack post then I would tell you to keep your comments relevant rather than pushing your *depop* is good theme via numerous links etc.

Are you holed up in a potential bunker in NZ.?

Where are you coming from?

Expand full comment

I eat mostly meat and dairy and drink water to stave off hunger. I eat twice a day around 11 AM and 5 PM. I have no sugar cravings and might have a slice of bread once a week. I’m 69, very healthy (for now) and active. GET OFF SUGAR.

Expand full comment

The Covid Vaccines are a totally different animal ...

They are purposed to exterminate.... yes that sounds nasty ... but if they did nothing the suffering would be far worse...

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-extinction-plan-uep

For good measure

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/why-dont-we-just-build-more-nuclear

We are so desperate that we are cannibalizing nuclear warheads to provide fuel for our nuclear power plants...

Then of course we are steaming oil out of sand.

These are desperate times... and desperate measures are in play

Expand full comment
founding

yawn......"desperate times".....heh...you mean like when three families live in a single apartment because that is all they can afford...This is how my relatives lived when they escaped from the death pit happening in the Soviet Union. We who live in the world's lap of luxury know nothing of what "desperate times" mean for the rest of the world. You could live in communist controlled China where anyone who doesn't like their policies or even just practices meditation in their yards is a candidate for forced organ harvesting.....Sure "THEY" are trying to kill the "little people"...when was it ever any different?

Expand full comment

Another racket ….

Glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are the current financial rainmakers for BIG PHARMA.

Expand full comment

Climate change indeed is a scam, if only because of the impossibility to define what it is.

However, there are numerous voices backed up by data suggesting that humankind is, or will shortly be, running out of energy, namely hydrocarbons, and other resources. After all, the finite nature of oil is rather obvious.

Question:

Is 'climate change' smokescreen for a push to make people change their consumerist behavior, to suppress them economically, based on the - at least seemingly - bona fide grounds that energy will be in short supply and so will be the availability of luxuries?

Are we witnessing the beginning of the battle for the 'last barrel of oil', an effort to usurp as much of the stuff as possible and to prolong the wild hydrocarbon party of the last 300 years somewhat longer? Where the 'elites' get a bigger piece of the pie, which goes without saying.

Expand full comment

Another school of thought is that the methane trapped in the planet at formation is constantly being converted into longer chain hydrocarbons deep in the Earth.

Oil is definitely not a fossil fuel, that’s a smart, Rockefeller lie. No official data can be relied upon to be objective because there are agendas.

Every day, useless crap is shipped around the world, guzzling marine diesel, while endless plastic is inefficiently used to over package said useless crap. Not exactly lighting up the control panel on the “we’re about to run out” indicator.

Expand full comment

It's not that 'we're about to run out' in the sense that the supply will end in the foreseeable future. It's that the low-hanging fruit is gone, and more energy is needed to extract energy - the EROEI is rising, making energy more expensive in physical terms, which in turn is reflected in 'financial' economy. For example: https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/

https://ourfiniteworld.com/author/gailtheactuary/

https://www.artberman.com/

Has the methane or hydrocarbon cycle you're referring to been reliably described? Where would energy contained in oil that would have to be infused into the process whereby methane is converted into oil come from? Sun? Inside Earth?

Sorry, but claiming or insinuating that since oil is being wasted it won't run out is a syllogistic fallacy. People do all sorts of stupid things, but that doesn't prove anything.

Why the push for electrification?

I don't doubt for second that Rockerfella and all the rest are giant assholes, but invoking that is an ad hominem fallacy which, once again, says nothing about the subject matter, i.e. whether oil and the rest are finite or not. Likewise, there will unfortunately always be agendas and people who use phenomena malevolently to their advantage.

BTW, I'm all ears, open to any explanation, argument, trying to be as objective as possible.

Expand full comment