SIR models are toy models and no policy of any kind should be based on them. We should not have to be playing with their models to tweak them in the other direction just to prove them wrong. It is very unfortunate that epidemiology is such a fraud. It is by far worst than climate "science", which is a lot, as you can tell.
It doesn't even matter if you try to use simulate-and-check methods, like in this paper:
There is no Infectious, Recovered or Susceptible population to begin with. Contagion, if it indeed does occur, does not work like that, at all. Not to promote myself but here you have some reflections about this issue:
Just say NO. Why be a part of the cartel$ of big pharma and big medicine? They see you simply as guinea pig$, or lab rat$, useful for experimenting on while they make boatload$ of money, all the while you remain $ick, di$ea$ed, or dead from their intervention$ designed to line their pocket$....it’s a sad state of affairs/lies that we have been indoctrinated/conned into believing for a very long time... 😢
Prof. Rancourt, what do you think about prof. Bossche epidemiological predictions of a new more virulent variant that will cause an increase of morbidity and mortality in heavily vaccinated countries?
The media were readings scripts and perpetrated cruelness towards those of us who "had a few questions". Whoever wrote the scripts are monsters or as Hannah Ardent describes, "Banality of Evil". As an unvaccinated nurse, CNN called me "stupid".
I never saw a pandemic at my hospital and witnessed serious medical adverse reactions following administration of the vaccines. The media and vaccinated (majority) are still refusing to acknowledge. "Take the Shots until you're Dead" is the most bizarre thing I've ever witnessed in over 20 years as a nurse.
"segregating unvaccinated people from the vaccinated majority can actually increase the severity of the epidemic among the vaccinated part of the population"
Does that mean they're complaining they now can't blame the unvaccinated for the outbreaks and want the unvaccinated to reintegrate so they can start blaming them again?
Maybe the unvaccinated should shun the vaccinated, so that way the vaccinated can't blame us when their shots fail to work.
"Maybe the unvaccinated should shun the vaccinated.."
A bad mistake; psychologically, politically, and morally, I believe this is the worst thing we could do?
This plays into the hands of the "Eugenicist Cabal". Why cause more strife and mistrust between ordinary people than already exists. Rather, play the missionary among the frightened. Show them that 'Unquestioning obedience' is the Greater Evil, and that The Wizard is just a frightened old man....
My reasoning was given in the comment: so they cannot hide the vaccinated cases by blaming the unvaccinated.
The study paper is upset that their own discrimination practices have *backfired on the vaccinated*. They don't care about you or me or any unvaccinated person, they only want us unvaccinated back because pushing us out, in their opinion, harms the vaccinated.
The real reason isn't we're offering them protection. It is the unvaccinated are being turned into scapegoats for the vaccinated outbreaks. No unvaccinated in their group, no scapegoats, and they have to turn inwardly to blame vaccinated.
This isn't a case of psychology; we should *not* comply and 'return' simply so they can scapegoat us. Either they admit the shots are faulty and come to the right conclusion (which is to *not* take the shot), or we don't go back.
They're basically blaming the absence of unvaccinated people as the reason for the vaccinated outbreaks. Fuck 'em.
Just for clarification: I am not a "Turn the other cheek", or even a Christian at all.
And I certainly won't "Come back". In some ways I never 'went away'. I was lucky enough to avoid medical institutions and I 'mostly' avoided masks. I managed to remain fairly Human.
However, I will not kiss any hand which slapped me!
Dog; I understand your reasoning, and might agree, except that "We" are a part of the Community. We are already a minority scattered throughout the bulk of humanity. Also, that community contains much of what has made us ;Human'; our Family, Friends, and associations, from the "Pre Covid era", I do not believe that "Segregation" even on our terms, would work?? Besides there are millions who were coerced into vaccination and now are fully aware of the consequences of Compliance. Are we to shun them also?
If you want to accept the likes of Albert Bourla and his goons so they can have another fresh attempt to murder your children under the guise of forgiveness (that always comes at the expense of the victim's own wellbeing) then that is a risk for you to take.
Personally I believe all child killers should be executed because they have presented a clear and present danger to society. There is hardly any reasonable scenario one needs to kill a child.
No, I will not be giving them forgiveness, and a "community" that once promoted murder is no community at all.
"Are we to shun them also?"
If they partook in the coercion and/or murder of others, yes.
If they don't like the consequences they shouldn't have engaged in the actions that led to it.
I'm not talking from a moral sense. I an also angry and vengeful.
But, from a practical standpoint; unless a person is willing to physically move to an area where either there are no people, or to a country that never required Jabs, then you had better be ready for conflict if you hold a purist stance? In Canada, with about an 80% Jab Rate, the unjabbed are a small minority.
Where would you draw the "Guilt line", and what is the "sentence"?
Also, would there be a court and police executioners? The existing justice system would never support this because over half those people would be of the wrong side of the new line.
No, the majority self-executed and self-harmed by taking the shot. Those still alive trying to push it upon others should be executed. Did serial murderers suddenly stop facing the death penalty (or if it is a State with no death penalty, consecutive life sentences in prison) simply because they outnumber people?
The ones who didn't take the shot, knew what was in it, and forced it upon others ought to be executed for war crimes. And I do mean the ones who gave the shot in person, not merely the corporate overlords.
Harsh? Yes. But the alternative is tolerating child killers. And if the Earth is primarily dominated by child killers, then we would have to go nuclear. Aggressive? Yes. But the line for murder was already crossed. Polite society cannot abide child killers.
"the unjabbed are a small minority."
There's only 3000 nukes in the US but even with such few numbers they can still be a force to be reckoned with. Numbers don't count; it is what you do with those numbers that do. I'm not sure an opponent who requires perpetual hospital treatment or a funeral service is going to be able to stand, even against a minority.
I mean, they die on the football pitches where their main competitor is a fellow jabbed. I could not conceive of them being defib'd in time in an out-and-out war.
Unvaccinated could simply withdraw services. The Australian healthcare service collapsed and had to beg for them to come back to keep it running. Airlines are running short of staff and behind schedule. The head of the Pentagon had to undergo cancer surgery leaving the US military like a headless chicken.
The jabbed are not in the position they think they were, and saying 'you must tolerate our mass murder because we're larger in numbers' is never going to wash with me. They can fuck off.
It's probably easier to just point out to the vax-o-holics that the experts, 'elites', VIP's and 'those in the know' did not take the covid vax (or any others). Bourla didn't take it because he didn't want to cut in line (chivalry). Tedros didn't take it because he wanted to stand in solidarity with Africa. Gates' family doctor from the 90's said he refused to let his children get vaxxed. Many VIP's and politicians were caught getting vaxxed with fake syringes (the needle disappeared into the syringe). And thousands of VIP's (and heads of big pharma companies) were caught buying fake vax certificates. Fauci took the vax on camera and then the next day patted the wrong arm when describing the soreness he felt at the injection site.
On top of that they all spent 2020 having parties, affairs, holidays and meetings and generally acting as if 'viral contagion' was not a real thing (which of course it isn't).
Rewind to 2009's fake pandemic and according to German Velasquez, Former WHO director, public health dept, “At the time of the Swine Flu outbreak I was general secretary in the Department of Public Health, Intellectual Property and Medication. Nobody there was afraid. I didn’t know anyone at the WHO who had himself vaccinated. Including the Director-General, who told journalists in response to their questions that she hadn’t had time, but would get herself vaccinated later”.
The point being..... the experts and elites who are pushing all this nonsense share the same views as the anti vaxxers and covid deniers (except without the honesty obviously).
This means the anti vaxxers and covid deniers are the true conformists in society. It's the mask wearers and vaccine takers who are the mavericks of society, and they are the ones now getting sick and dying from 2 years of reckless drug abuse.
They were all motivated by wanting to conform to the herd, but thanks to the gaslighting and misdirection from the media they have now ended up being the demographic that is completely out on a limb, while everyone else remains vaccine free and healthy.
When the 'normies' realise they are society's new demographic of dirty drug users they will snap out of their trance in a heart beat because conformity is their primary motivation, and being outside of the tribe is their biggest fear.
It's a brutal truth. And they can't say we did not try to warn them. But it's the truth. I cannot think of any other way to wake them up but make them aware of how EXPERTLY they have been gaslighted. And how those horrible anti vaxxers have always been the only people in society who actually cared for their health and wellbeing.
Where did the 12 people catch "it" from? From an animal host? And this one did catch it where from? Another single animal? Not involved in the food chain or rather food web where each animal, each organism is connected with others? How can a zoonotic jump always happen movie-like between one animal (not sick, still alive), that pooed all over its territory, but never ifects the whole flock or other species but catches "the virus" from another animal, again not sick, not dead, not from an infected flock or herd, and transmits the "one and only particle" to a human, and all that without the particle being found in only one of the diseased hosts? While assuming that "its" existence starts when a phoney test is available which finds the unknown piece without reference in nature but with the help of a puzzeling Computer? Why not did "it" exist ever since because "it" is cellular debris, non transmissible, but the most natural thing under the sun when organisms renew themselves, detoxify themselves to stay alive? Is that too simple or simply not profitable enough? Just asking. Fed up with that shit.
If vaccines work, why do they claim that not vaccinated people put them at risk?
Oh yeah, the bullshit variants etc.
Ok then, geniuses, how come you're pushing vaccines that haven't been updated to whatever mythical strains you claim are out there?
Virology is pseudoscience. It distracts people from the many other causes of sickness.
Thank you so much for this article, and for speaking the truth.
Be happy you don't live in New York state where der Fuhrer Hochul can lock you up!
Hi Denis,
SIR models are toy models and no policy of any kind should be based on them. We should not have to be playing with their models to tweak them in the other direction just to prove them wrong. It is very unfortunate that epidemiology is such a fraud. It is by far worst than climate "science", which is a lot, as you can tell.
It doesn't even matter if you try to use simulate-and-check methods, like in this paper:
Limits of epidemic prediction using SIR models
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487859/
There is no Infectious, Recovered or Susceptible population to begin with. Contagion, if it indeed does occur, does not work like that, at all. Not to promote myself but here you have some reflections about this issue:
Our Misleading and Superstitious notion of Contagion and the Fraudulent Basic Reproduction Number in Epidemiology (+ New Perspectives) https://agustinsanchezcobos.substack.com/p/the-misleading-and-superstitious
Reply to Dr. Byram Bridle in relation to the statement: "A highly transmissible virus that is in 12 people sprinkled around the world would be capable of spreading rapidly." https://agustinsanchezcobos.substack.com/p/reply-to-dr-byram-bridle
They"-of course knew all this.
Just say NO. Why be a part of the cartel$ of big pharma and big medicine? They see you simply as guinea pig$, or lab rat$, useful for experimenting on while they make boatload$ of money, all the while you remain $ick, di$ea$ed, or dead from their intervention$ designed to line their pocket$....it’s a sad state of affairs/lies that we have been indoctrinated/conned into believing for a very long time... 😢
Prof. Rancourt, what do you think about prof. Bossche epidemiological predictions of a new more virulent variant that will cause an increase of morbidity and mortality in heavily vaccinated countries?
It think it is a hypothesis, which it may be possible to test, but for which there is not presently any empirical evidence.
Our work suggests that there has never been a virulent pathogen that is the driving cause of any epidemic.
See our video presentations from this list: https://denisrancourt.ca/page.php?id=12&name=videos
And our written reports...
Cheers.
The media were readings scripts and perpetrated cruelness towards those of us who "had a few questions". Whoever wrote the scripts are monsters or as Hannah Ardent describes, "Banality of Evil". As an unvaccinated nurse, CNN called me "stupid".
I never saw a pandemic at my hospital and witnessed serious medical adverse reactions following administration of the vaccines. The media and vaccinated (majority) are still refusing to acknowledge. "Take the Shots until you're Dead" is the most bizarre thing I've ever witnessed in over 20 years as a nurse.
"segregating unvaccinated people from the vaccinated majority can actually increase the severity of the epidemic among the vaccinated part of the population"
Does that mean they're complaining they now can't blame the unvaccinated for the outbreaks and want the unvaccinated to reintegrate so they can start blaming them again?
Maybe the unvaccinated should shun the vaccinated, so that way the vaccinated can't blame us when their shots fail to work.
"Maybe the unvaccinated should shun the vaccinated.."
A bad mistake; psychologically, politically, and morally, I believe this is the worst thing we could do?
This plays into the hands of the "Eugenicist Cabal". Why cause more strife and mistrust between ordinary people than already exists. Rather, play the missionary among the frightened. Show them that 'Unquestioning obedience' is the Greater Evil, and that The Wizard is just a frightened old man....
My reasoning was given in the comment: so they cannot hide the vaccinated cases by blaming the unvaccinated.
The study paper is upset that their own discrimination practices have *backfired on the vaccinated*. They don't care about you or me or any unvaccinated person, they only want us unvaccinated back because pushing us out, in their opinion, harms the vaccinated.
The real reason isn't we're offering them protection. It is the unvaccinated are being turned into scapegoats for the vaccinated outbreaks. No unvaccinated in their group, no scapegoats, and they have to turn inwardly to blame vaccinated.
This isn't a case of psychology; we should *not* comply and 'return' simply so they can scapegoat us. Either they admit the shots are faulty and come to the right conclusion (which is to *not* take the shot), or we don't go back.
They're basically blaming the absence of unvaccinated people as the reason for the vaccinated outbreaks. Fuck 'em.
Just for clarification: I am not a "Turn the other cheek", or even a Christian at all.
And I certainly won't "Come back". In some ways I never 'went away'. I was lucky enough to avoid medical institutions and I 'mostly' avoided masks. I managed to remain fairly Human.
However, I will not kiss any hand which slapped me!
Dog; I understand your reasoning, and might agree, except that "We" are a part of the Community. We are already a minority scattered throughout the bulk of humanity. Also, that community contains much of what has made us ;Human'; our Family, Friends, and associations, from the "Pre Covid era", I do not believe that "Segregation" even on our terms, would work?? Besides there are millions who were coerced into vaccination and now are fully aware of the consequences of Compliance. Are we to shun them also?
If you want to accept the likes of Albert Bourla and his goons so they can have another fresh attempt to murder your children under the guise of forgiveness (that always comes at the expense of the victim's own wellbeing) then that is a risk for you to take.
Personally I believe all child killers should be executed because they have presented a clear and present danger to society. There is hardly any reasonable scenario one needs to kill a child.
No, I will not be giving them forgiveness, and a "community" that once promoted murder is no community at all.
"Are we to shun them also?"
If they partook in the coercion and/or murder of others, yes.
If they don't like the consequences they shouldn't have engaged in the actions that led to it.
@Underdog;
I'm not talking from a moral sense. I an also angry and vengeful.
But, from a practical standpoint; unless a person is willing to physically move to an area where either there are no people, or to a country that never required Jabs, then you had better be ready for conflict if you hold a purist stance? In Canada, with about an 80% Jab Rate, the unjabbed are a small minority.
Where would you draw the "Guilt line", and what is the "sentence"?
Also, would there be a court and police executioners? The existing justice system would never support this because over half those people would be of the wrong side of the new line.
Back from research and write-ups.
"would there be a court and police executioners?"
No, the majority self-executed and self-harmed by taking the shot. Those still alive trying to push it upon others should be executed. Did serial murderers suddenly stop facing the death penalty (or if it is a State with no death penalty, consecutive life sentences in prison) simply because they outnumber people?
The ones who didn't take the shot, knew what was in it, and forced it upon others ought to be executed for war crimes. And I do mean the ones who gave the shot in person, not merely the corporate overlords.
Harsh? Yes. But the alternative is tolerating child killers. And if the Earth is primarily dominated by child killers, then we would have to go nuclear. Aggressive? Yes. But the line for murder was already crossed. Polite society cannot abide child killers.
"the unjabbed are a small minority."
There's only 3000 nukes in the US but even with such few numbers they can still be a force to be reckoned with. Numbers don't count; it is what you do with those numbers that do. I'm not sure an opponent who requires perpetual hospital treatment or a funeral service is going to be able to stand, even against a minority.
I mean, they die on the football pitches where their main competitor is a fellow jabbed. I could not conceive of them being defib'd in time in an out-and-out war.
Unvaccinated could simply withdraw services. The Australian healthcare service collapsed and had to beg for them to come back to keep it running. Airlines are running short of staff and behind schedule. The head of the Pentagon had to undergo cancer surgery leaving the US military like a headless chicken.
The jabbed are not in the position they think they were, and saying 'you must tolerate our mass murder because we're larger in numbers' is never going to wash with me. They can fuck off.
It's probably easier to just point out to the vax-o-holics that the experts, 'elites', VIP's and 'those in the know' did not take the covid vax (or any others). Bourla didn't take it because he didn't want to cut in line (chivalry). Tedros didn't take it because he wanted to stand in solidarity with Africa. Gates' family doctor from the 90's said he refused to let his children get vaxxed. Many VIP's and politicians were caught getting vaxxed with fake syringes (the needle disappeared into the syringe). And thousands of VIP's (and heads of big pharma companies) were caught buying fake vax certificates. Fauci took the vax on camera and then the next day patted the wrong arm when describing the soreness he felt at the injection site.
On top of that they all spent 2020 having parties, affairs, holidays and meetings and generally acting as if 'viral contagion' was not a real thing (which of course it isn't).
Rewind to 2009's fake pandemic and according to German Velasquez, Former WHO director, public health dept, “At the time of the Swine Flu outbreak I was general secretary in the Department of Public Health, Intellectual Property and Medication. Nobody there was afraid. I didn’t know anyone at the WHO who had himself vaccinated. Including the Director-General, who told journalists in response to their questions that she hadn’t had time, but would get herself vaccinated later”.
The point being..... the experts and elites who are pushing all this nonsense share the same views as the anti vaxxers and covid deniers (except without the honesty obviously).
This means the anti vaxxers and covid deniers are the true conformists in society. It's the mask wearers and vaccine takers who are the mavericks of society, and they are the ones now getting sick and dying from 2 years of reckless drug abuse.
They were all motivated by wanting to conform to the herd, but thanks to the gaslighting and misdirection from the media they have now ended up being the demographic that is completely out on a limb, while everyone else remains vaccine free and healthy.
When the 'normies' realise they are society's new demographic of dirty drug users they will snap out of their trance in a heart beat because conformity is their primary motivation, and being outside of the tribe is their biggest fear.
It's a brutal truth. And they can't say we did not try to warn them. But it's the truth. I cannot think of any other way to wake them up but make them aware of how EXPERTLY they have been gaslighted. And how those horrible anti vaxxers have always been the only people in society who actually cared for their health and wellbeing.
When you think about it, staying away from the vaccinated actually protects the unvaccinated- who wants to be shed upon?
I find it IRRATIONAL that the vaccinated whine about well-documented and sometimes even permanent side-effects.
It would be great if the vaccinated just left the UNVACCINATED ALONE.
Juvenile drama should stay in childhood.
Jab Crow don’tcha know
Where did the 12 people catch "it" from? From an animal host? And this one did catch it where from? Another single animal? Not involved in the food chain or rather food web where each animal, each organism is connected with others? How can a zoonotic jump always happen movie-like between one animal (not sick, still alive), that pooed all over its territory, but never ifects the whole flock or other species but catches "the virus" from another animal, again not sick, not dead, not from an infected flock or herd, and transmits the "one and only particle" to a human, and all that without the particle being found in only one of the diseased hosts? While assuming that "its" existence starts when a phoney test is available which finds the unknown piece without reference in nature but with the help of a puzzeling Computer? Why not did "it" exist ever since because "it" is cellular debris, non transmissible, but the most natural thing under the sun when organisms renew themselves, detoxify themselves to stay alive? Is that too simple or simply not profitable enough? Just asking. Fed up with that shit.