What I had to go through to see my mother was awful. I truly hope you paper will make a difference Denis. Thank you and your team for all your hard work.
Listen to EVENT 201 (October 2019 final exercise training for the deployment of OPERATION COVIDIUS) and then listen to the recent WHO spew for the future to come!
Thank you for being brave, I was threatened being banned at one for inquiring to the staff why my father-in-law was not out of bed and dressed. The staff was so overwhelmed with so many tasks, their time was limited with patients.
Through windows, I watched my father-in-law, mentally disabled brother, and my Nana G dies in a convalescent home. I recall a nurse outside taking a break, crying her eyes out. The word she used to describe what was happening was extermination. 😭
Just think of all the money saved by the pension funds and governments by the deaths of the elderly. Guess it is true every cloud has a silver lining. On the downside for the "useless eaters": Batter up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for this study, again. It is a tool against tyrannical messures: we shall never more accept anything against our common sense, against every little aspect that shows connection-compassion-empathy. The maniac idea that we "must protect ourself" from nature is demential: the damage and destruction caused was premeditated.
Yes. Was prohibited from attending my mother's 100th and 101st birthday celebrations (she even lived through at least 2 shots). Luckily was able to attend her death, although my sister melted down over my not being forced to wear a mask for the event! Covidiocy at its finest.
Dr. Rancourt, thank you for this paper which I have only just discovered.
I will go on to read it, but at the outset would it be fair to say that the paper undermines the case for the Great Barrington Declaration (i.e., isolation of the vulnerable specifically), which was offered as a moderate alternative to the mass house arrest that so many governments imposed in 2020?
At some point I should read the study. For now I have this idea rolling around in my head that if the way vaccines are built is by attenuating a virus...that that means putting in a series of cultures to weaken it...then would it be possible then that being exposed to a virus via contact with a person with a healthy immune system that is already on the mend is the equivalent of getting an attenuated version of the virus? While being around more people with below average immune systems means exposure to less attenuated versions of the pathogen?
Coords: your mileage might vary on this... but most of virus/vaccine theory only makes sense if you realize that there are no viruses, and that all vaccines are simply a slow poison. What you wrote really does make sense in the virus model, but as Mr Rancourt points out -- covid itself doesn't follow the virus model, nor do the seasonal peaks in mortality that are attributed to 'flu'. So what does follow the virus model... well, nothing.
There is a Dr. Stillwagon who lays out an interesting alternative understanding of viruses. That they exist but for the most part don't cause disease. In the video I saw he suggests that they are an information exchange between our respiratory system and the environment including perhaps other breathing organisms. This alternative version is one that I find interesting and do wonder if life/evolution has constructed a way for all breathing organisms to share information as they adapt to variations in the air we breathe. Stillwagon claims its not that the particles attack our cells so much as the cells actively draw them in. If so why? To what end? I'd love to learn more about the potential overlap between allergic responses and immunological ones or how the two responses are told apart. Where does the line get drawn between immunology and toxicology?
What I had to go through to see my mother was awful. I truly hope you paper will make a difference Denis. Thank you and your team for all your hard work.
Terrible
Keep on hoping...
Listen to EVENT 201 (October 2019 final exercise training for the deployment of OPERATION COVIDIUS) and then listen to the recent WHO spew for the future to come!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CM6LVkjH4ywU/
While you (we) keep on hoping They (SRF & Billionaires) keep on ACTING in order to screw us even more.
They were isolated from us so the State could more easily administer their programs of involuntary euthanasia without violent family protest.
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/the-death-penalty-drugs-used-by-care
Edit: and for the record my mother put my 94 y/o Nanna into a "care" home in Nov. 2021. She died Feb 11, 2022.
Terrible! Our elderly didn’t stand a chance! No ONE but no ONE stood up or protected them except family members.
I actually screamed as loudly as I could in many venues about it, back in 2020.
Thank you for being brave, I was threatened being banned at one for inquiring to the staff why my father-in-law was not out of bed and dressed. The staff was so overwhelmed with so many tasks, their time was limited with patients.
Through windows, I watched my father-in-law, mentally disabled brother, and my Nana G dies in a convalescent home. I recall a nurse outside taking a break, crying her eyes out. The word she used to describe what was happening was extermination. 😭
Sorry Charlotte, I snuck a few people in as a hospitalist . Probably one of the reasons I got fired . I would do it all over again .
Bless your golden heart, you are one of the divine light workers 🕯🙏♥️
Bravo! (Alas...) Hope the journal doesn't retract it. Best wishes!
Just think of all the money saved by the pension funds and governments by the deaths of the elderly. Guess it is true every cloud has a silver lining. On the downside for the "useless eaters": Batter up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is no value on human life anymore.
Irrespective, governments need to stop forcing “protection”, and allow freedom.
Thank you Prof, I couldn't agree more.
Thanks for this study, again. It is a tool against tyrannical messures: we shall never more accept anything against our common sense, against every little aspect that shows connection-compassion-empathy. The maniac idea that we "must protect ourself" from nature is demential: the damage and destruction caused was premeditated.
Yes. Was prohibited from attending my mother's 100th and 101st birthday celebrations (she even lived through at least 2 shots). Luckily was able to attend her death, although my sister melted down over my not being forced to wear a mask for the event! Covidiocy at its finest.
Dr. Rancourt, thank you for this paper which I have only just discovered.
I will go on to read it, but at the outset would it be fair to say that the paper undermines the case for the Great Barrington Declaration (i.e., isolation of the vulnerable specifically), which was offered as a moderate alternative to the mass house arrest that so many governments imposed in 2020?
Who would sign up for this ! Safe travels Dr . Yeadon . https://www.healio.com/news/infectious-disease/20231030/researchers-infect-women-with-zika-virus-to-help-find-a-vaccine?utm_source=selligent&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news
At some point I should read the study. For now I have this idea rolling around in my head that if the way vaccines are built is by attenuating a virus...that that means putting in a series of cultures to weaken it...then would it be possible then that being exposed to a virus via contact with a person with a healthy immune system that is already on the mend is the equivalent of getting an attenuated version of the virus? While being around more people with below average immune systems means exposure to less attenuated versions of the pathogen?
Coords: your mileage might vary on this... but most of virus/vaccine theory only makes sense if you realize that there are no viruses, and that all vaccines are simply a slow poison. What you wrote really does make sense in the virus model, but as Mr Rancourt points out -- covid itself doesn't follow the virus model, nor do the seasonal peaks in mortality that are attributed to 'flu'. So what does follow the virus model... well, nothing.
ShiYen
There is a Dr. Stillwagon who lays out an interesting alternative understanding of viruses. That they exist but for the most part don't cause disease. In the video I saw he suggests that they are an information exchange between our respiratory system and the environment including perhaps other breathing organisms. This alternative version is one that I find interesting and do wonder if life/evolution has constructed a way for all breathing organisms to share information as they adapt to variations in the air we breathe. Stillwagon claims its not that the particles attack our cells so much as the cells actively draw them in. If so why? To what end? I'd love to learn more about the potential overlap between allergic responses and immunological ones or how the two responses are told apart. Where does the line get drawn between immunology and toxicology?