More debate is needed in medical-freedom circles
One should not without epidemiological proof accept the view that excess mortality patterns are compatible with the paradigm of respiratory viral spread
In particular, authors of this overview (“What Lessons can Be Learned From the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic?”) have been important resisters against the government medical tyranny that was the planned-and-executed covid campaign:
Gerry A. Quinn1,2*
Ronan Connolly2,3*
Coilín ÓhAiseadha4,5
Paul Hynds5,6
Carlos F. Cáceres9
Clare Craig10
Michael Connolly2,3
Paul Frijters13
Steven Hatfill14
Raymond Heymans15
Ari R. Joffe16
Therese Lawrie18
Alan Mordue20
Greta Mushet20
Jane Orient21
José Antonio Peña-Ramos22
Harvey A. Risch23
Jessica Rose24
Antonio Sánchez-Bayón25
Dragos Simandan28
Karol Sikora29
Willie Soon2,30
Yaffa Shir-Raz31
HOWEVER, they are resisting the idea that the excess mortality was NOT caused by a spreading virus
The 37 authors have adopted the viral spread narrative, completely and throughout their paper. For example:
which IMO must be critically assessed.
In this regard, they are joined by eminent critics including Great Barrington Declaration author Jay Bhattacharya and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr (who once interviewed me on this question).
In effect, with such a paper, the authors are arguably playing the societal role of "cooling the mark out" (Wikipedia), by saying how to improve response in the future while essentially accepting the overriding establishment paradigm of recurring catastrophic viral respiratory pandemics.
My scientific collaborators and I have repeatedly since (June 2nd) 2020 argued that the spread narrative is disproved by mortality data. For example, our latest (13 June 2025) large report: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202506.1240/v1 (“Constraints from geotemporal evolution of all-cause mortality on the hypothesis of disease spread during Covid”) (substack). Highlights of some graphical results are presented in a thread on X.
This means that the paradigm that a spreading viral respiratory disease caused the excess mortality during Covid is false. The said paradigm is disproved by empirical observations of high-resolution (weekly-monthly, county-region) geotemporal variations of age and frailty adusted excess mortality (P-score) on two continents in the Northern Hemisphere.
Instead, the excess mortality appears to be entirely iatrogenic and induced by the imposed so-called pandemic response.
Therefore, if this is correct, any comments about circulating viruses or variants (e.g., based on PCR or antibody tests of bodily fluids), whether true or false, are irrelevant to the excess mortality.
It is time to acknowledge that a paradigm shift may be necessary, and to adjust epidemiological thinking accordingly.
I for one do not want to live in a political environment in which recurring potentially catastrophic viral respiratory pandemics are taken to be real and we can be saved by better institutions, freedom of expression of professionals, and the “medical freedom” of practitioners.
I don’t want to fix a lie used for large-scale manipulation, exploitation and control.
Of course individual bodily sovereignty and individual health freedom regarding exposures, consumption, treatments and injections should be absolute.
Please consider upgrading your subscription to help our continuing efforts.
And subscribe also to
.
Time for debate is over. RFK can take action now, but he won't so all the debating in the world is not going to matter. While the medical freedom community is fiddling around, the noose tightens.
We are still under the prep act and its EUA (emergency use authority) whereby at any time they can declare another fake pandemic and push newer, untested mRNA poisons upon us. All of it will be legal because of the prep act.
The Covid Event is not an epidemiological story it is a crime story.
If you view the 'pandemic' through the lens of health, safety, science and saving lives, then most of it makes little sense. If you view it through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer, then all of it makes perfect sense.
The covid campaign was not an isolated episode but, rather, a highly organized undertaking disguised as a public health emergency. This multi-faceted structural event was the culmination of the Deep State’s decades-old determination to institute a raft of invasive policies—including the worldwide suspension of basic civil liberties—to salvage their crumbling financial empire and usher in a complete transformation of society.
Another of the major components of this terror operation was to greatly reduce the gargantuan problem of trillions in unfunded liabilities facing all Western financial systems. This meant eliminating large swathes of disabled and elderly people who rely on government assistance and/or pensions.
The Covid Operation was set in motion in the summer of 2019 and launched in March 2020 in order to change the entire financial and social order of The West due to a confluence of existential crises that were facing the ruling class parasites which could no longer be kicked down the road.
The introduction of the Covid-19 “emergency” was the circuit breaker and the rationale used to freeze the US banking system and provide the opportunity to inject massive amounts of cash into the system that went to large financial investment and banking firms- aka bailouts. Same was done in the EU.
There was no pandemic ever- there is no “lab leak”- there is no “unique viral pathogen”- there is no “China Virus”- there is no “bioweapon”- There is no “There” there.
Covid-19, the disease, is nothing more than a disease of FALSE ATTRIBUTION. Covid-19, the media event, was the Trojan Horse constructed to usher in a complete transformation of our society- an endeavor of complete social control. Covid-19, the operation, was never an epidemiological event, it is a business model meant to increase the portfolios of the super-wealthy.
There is no such thing as “Covid 19” except as a criminal conspiracy. The official narrative of “Covid” is fictional- all facets of it.