The article said: "They also found that all 17 countries, which make up 10.3% of the global population, had an unprecedented rise in all-cause mortality that corresponded directly to vaccine and booster rollouts." However in Ecuador and Bolivia the highest excess mortality was in 2020 before the jabs were rolled out. So if Ecuador and Bolivia had further spikes in excess deaths after the jabs were rolled out, then were the spikes "unprecedented" since there had already been a bigger spike in 2020?
The article also repeated the claim that in 9 out of 17 countries there was "no detectable excess mortality in the year or so between when a pandemic is announced on 11 March 2020 and the starting time of the first vaccine rollout in each country". However one of the 9 countries was Paraguay, where the excess mortality reported by OWID increased from about -13% in June 2020 to about 22% in September 2020, and around the same time the PCR positivity rate increased from about 2% to about 30% and the daily number of COVID deaths increased from about 0 to about 20. And another of the 7 countries was Suriname, which also had an increase in excess deaths around August 2020 which coincided with bumps in both PCR positivity rate and COVID deaths.
The article said: "However, the researchers said, 'In all 17 countries, vaccination is associated with a regime of high mortality, and there is no association in time between COVID-19 vaccination and proportionate reduction in ACM.'" However for example in Peru, there were two huge spikes in excess mortality before the jabs were rolled out, but in January-February 2022 when the percentage of vaccinated people had reached about 70-80%, there was a third spike in excess mortality but it ended up being much lower than the two previous spikes even though the maximum PCR positivity rate was higher than during the two previous spikes. (It might be that people in Peru already had natural immunity at the time of the third spike, but the reduced magnitude of the spike would still be "associated" with a higher vaccination rate even if the association would not be causal.)
According to OWID's data for Peru, the average excess mortality was about 90% between March 6th 2020 when there was the first COVID death and June 8th 2021 which was the last day when the percentage of vaccinated people was below 10%, but from June 9th 2021 until September 30th 2022 after which there was a low number of new vaccines given, the average excess mortality was only about 6%:
The article also said: "Also, all 17 countries showed a strong correlation with higher rates of ACM in early 2021, following the initial vaccine rollout and in early 2022, when the boosters were rolled out." However in Australia and New Zealand, the excess mortality remained flat throughout 2021, and in New Zealand it even decreased steadily from January 2021 until September 2021.
(But apparently the author of the CHD article had a Ph.D. in "human geography". Someone with an education in mathematics or hard sciences would be more wary of claiming that some statement is true for all 17 elements in a set, since their claim will be false if there is one element in the set for which the statement is false.)
The article referred to this paragraph of your paper: "Unprecedented peaks in ACM occur in the summer (January-February) of 2022 in the Southern Hemisphere, and in equatorial-latitude countries, which are synchronous with or immediately preceded by rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts (3rd or 4th doses). This phenomenon is present in every case with sufficient mortality data (15 countries). Two of the countries studied have insufficient mortality data in January- February 2022 (Argentina and Suriname)."
I don't know if the reason why the peaks are supposed to be "unprecedented" is that they occurred in the southern-hemisphere summer. But in Colombia, Peru, and South Africa, there was a higher peak in excess deaths in January-February 2021 than in January-February 2022 (at least according to OWID's excess mortality data from the World Mortality Dataset): https://i.ibb.co/CKY7ny5/nopandemic-rancourt-unprecedented.png. Bolivia also had higher excess mortality in January 2021 than January 2022 even though Bolivia is missing data for February 2022.
The article also referred to this part of your paper: "Detailed mortality and vaccination data for Chile and Peru allow resolution by age and by dose number. It is unlikely that the observed peaks in all-cause mortality in January- February 2022 (and additionally in: July-August 2021, Chile; July-August 2022, Peru), in each of both countries and in each elderly age group, could be due to any cause other than the temporally associated rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts."
However on pages 72 to 75 where there's plots by age group for Chile, I don't see any peak in all-cause mortality in July-August 2021 that coincides with a vaccine rollout. There is a peak in excess deaths around June or late July 2021, but a new vaccine dose is introduced only about 2 months later in August or September, and there is a sharp decrease in excess mortality around the time when the new vaccine dose is introduced: https://i.ibb.co/LZRcTG0/rancourt-chile.gif.
At OWID the peak in excess mortality in Chile already occurs in March-April 2021, but I think it's because OWID's data is adjusted for seasonality and your data is not, so OWID has lower excess mortality in the southern-hemisphere winter: https://i.ibb.co/WV2vWLc/owid-chile.png.
Thank you for sharing this link. I just watched it for the first time today and it's absolutely shocking. The only conclusion I can come to is that this coercive, manipulative vax push was an intentional attack on the global population. I mean, what other explanation is there? Incompetence? Nah, I think not. This is sinister.
Also, is there any idea of how this will affect fertility and future population growth?
“ Also, is there any idea of how this will affect fertility and future population growth?”
Or for that matter the conservative vote due to the higher death rate in the elderly who were affected to a much higher degree. Sinister and prophetic. And all downwind of the reserve and its fiat currency that unhinged mankind from true accounting accountability and consequence in governance .. Covid was a fiat business plan netting these creeps more than a trillion fiat dollars that will now fund their killing machine into the foreseeable future. Makes me sick to see the fPhizer ads rolling in one after another. We have not owned a television for over 25 years, but I like to watch playoff sports and bring them in on my computer.. and the pharmaceutical ads are pretty much now one right after the other.
Thanks! Your research is extremely valuable and I am grateful to learn this information. Many of my elderly friends are continuing to recommend boosters for seniors, even though they are starting to recognize their harm and lack of efficacy for younger populations. The continued main stream warning to "Protect grandma" incentivizes people to get vaccinated. Hopefully, we will be able to recognize that "protect grandma" is not at all what these vaccines do.
Just think about it, these con-artists have opportunistically/successfully turned the ‘annual/seasonal respiratory sickness season’ (the good old cold and flu season, wherever you live on the globe ) into a money-making profit through crap PCR tests (got us all testing for colds!) and acceptance of a pan coronavirus vaccine…
Many have been enriched via this scam, test manufacturers, testing labs, vaccine manufacturers, etc. AND basically they have deked us into testing for the cold! Ka’ching! The gift that will keep on giving as colds are never going away… 😑
This is stunning. The millions killed is so horrible as to be rejected by my mind, it will not accept these atrocities as true. It going to take some time to accept.
This isn't related to the Southern Hemisphere per se, but something I'm wondering about:
"The large gap between incorrectly inferred and actual population-level vDFR values probably occurs because of systemic avoidance of admitting the injections as a possible cause of death in frail and vulnerable patients."
WRT the gap between incorrectly inferred and actual, when someone dies, is their vaccination-status even recorded? This is entering my mind this morning (Sept 25th) because I ran the marathon in Montreal yesterday, and there were two cardiac arrests. Luckily EMTs were ready and resuscitated both, but of course I am wondering if they were vaccinated. I suspect, however, that even when they were taken to hospital, no one asked or recorded whether they were or not.
If this piece of data is not even collected, doesn't it make it impossible, or nearly so, to evaluate the effect these jabs are having?
Two years ago if I wanted to go a restaurant or shopping mall, it was demanded to know if I was vaccinated. Today someone can have a heart attack and if you ask if they were vaccinated its considered rude, intrusive, and worst of all, not revelant.
Children's Health Defense reported on our study today:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-rollouts-all-cause-mortality/
"‘Definite Causal Link’ Between COVID Vaccine Rollouts and Peaks in All-Cause Mortality, New Study Finds
Researchers estimated the COVID-19 vaccines led to approximately 17 million deaths worldwide, with the most deaths occuring among the elderly."
By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
The article said: "They also found that all 17 countries, which make up 10.3% of the global population, had an unprecedented rise in all-cause mortality that corresponded directly to vaccine and booster rollouts." However in Ecuador and Bolivia the highest excess mortality was in 2020 before the jabs were rolled out. So if Ecuador and Bolivia had further spikes in excess deaths after the jabs were rolled out, then were the spikes "unprecedented" since there had already been a bigger spike in 2020?
The article also repeated the claim that in 9 out of 17 countries there was "no detectable excess mortality in the year or so between when a pandemic is announced on 11 March 2020 and the starting time of the first vaccine rollout in each country". However one of the 9 countries was Paraguay, where the excess mortality reported by OWID increased from about -13% in June 2020 to about 22% in September 2020, and around the same time the PCR positivity rate increased from about 2% to about 30% and the daily number of COVID deaths increased from about 0 to about 20. And another of the 7 countries was Suriname, which also had an increase in excess deaths around August 2020 which coincided with bumps in both PCR positivity rate and COVID deaths.
The article said: "However, the researchers said, 'In all 17 countries, vaccination is associated with a regime of high mortality, and there is no association in time between COVID-19 vaccination and proportionate reduction in ACM.'" However for example in Peru, there were two huge spikes in excess mortality before the jabs were rolled out, but in January-February 2022 when the percentage of vaccinated people had reached about 70-80%, there was a third spike in excess mortality but it ended up being much lower than the two previous spikes even though the maximum PCR positivity rate was higher than during the two previous spikes. (It might be that people in Peru already had natural immunity at the time of the third spike, but the reduced magnitude of the spike would still be "associated" with a higher vaccination rate even if the association would not be causal.)
According to OWID's data for Peru, the average excess mortality was about 90% between March 6th 2020 when there was the first COVID death and June 8th 2021 which was the last day when the percentage of vaccinated people was below 10%, but from June 9th 2021 until September 30th 2022 after which there was a low number of new vaccines given, the average excess mortality was only about 6%:
t=read.csv("https://covid.ourworldindata.org/data/owid-covid-data.csv")
t2=t[t$location=="Peru",]
mort=zoo::na.approx(t2$excess_mortality,na.rm=F)
mean(mort[t2$date>="2020-03-16"&t2$date<="2021-06-08"])
mean(mort[t2$date>="2021-06-09"&t2$date<="2022-09-30"])
The article also said: "Also, all 17 countries showed a strong correlation with higher rates of ACM in early 2021, following the initial vaccine rollout and in early 2022, when the boosters were rolled out." However in Australia and New Zealand, the excess mortality remained flat throughout 2021, and in New Zealand it even decreased steadily from January 2021 until September 2021.
(But apparently the author of the CHD article had a Ph.D. in "human geography". Someone with an education in mathematics or hard sciences would be more wary of claiming that some statement is true for all 17 elements in a set, since their claim will be false if there is one element in the set for which the statement is false.)
Epoch Times report about our study, with reaction from Stephanie Seneff: https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/covid-vaccines-causally-linked-to-increased-mortality-resulting-in-17-million-deaths-scientific-report-5499001
The article referred to this paragraph of your paper: "Unprecedented peaks in ACM occur in the summer (January-February) of 2022 in the Southern Hemisphere, and in equatorial-latitude countries, which are synchronous with or immediately preceded by rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts (3rd or 4th doses). This phenomenon is present in every case with sufficient mortality data (15 countries). Two of the countries studied have insufficient mortality data in January- February 2022 (Argentina and Suriname)."
I don't know if the reason why the peaks are supposed to be "unprecedented" is that they occurred in the southern-hemisphere summer. But in Colombia, Peru, and South Africa, there was a higher peak in excess deaths in January-February 2021 than in January-February 2022 (at least according to OWID's excess mortality data from the World Mortality Dataset): https://i.ibb.co/CKY7ny5/nopandemic-rancourt-unprecedented.png. Bolivia also had higher excess mortality in January 2021 than January 2022 even though Bolivia is missing data for February 2022.
The article also referred to this part of your paper: "Detailed mortality and vaccination data for Chile and Peru allow resolution by age and by dose number. It is unlikely that the observed peaks in all-cause mortality in January- February 2022 (and additionally in: July-August 2021, Chile; July-August 2022, Peru), in each of both countries and in each elderly age group, could be due to any cause other than the temporally associated rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts."
However on pages 72 to 75 where there's plots by age group for Chile, I don't see any peak in all-cause mortality in July-August 2021 that coincides with a vaccine rollout. There is a peak in excess deaths around June or late July 2021, but a new vaccine dose is introduced only about 2 months later in August or September, and there is a sharp decrease in excess mortality around the time when the new vaccine dose is introduced: https://i.ibb.co/LZRcTG0/rancourt-chile.gif.
At OWID the peak in excess mortality in Chile already occurs in March-April 2021, but I think it's because OWID's data is adjusted for seasonality and your data is not, so OWID has lower excess mortality in the southern-hemisphere winter: https://i.ibb.co/WV2vWLc/owid-chile.png.
BTW I recommend watching these videos about Falun Gong by John Brisson and Joel [Redacted]: https://altcensored.com/watch?v=rtlpgXEzE6Q, https://odysee.com/@ExposeTheEnemy:b/trump,-qanon,-epoch-times-cia-linked. Or read this article about Falun Gong that was published in the Executive Intelligence Review: https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4703-the_modern_synarchist_project.html.
Thank you for relentlessly performing these data analyses, Denis. I have collected tens of thousands of pieces of evidence over the past three years, but my #1 go-to for building the case that Mistakes Were NOT Made is now your National Citizen's Inquiry presentation (https://rumble.com/v2ohtte-physicist-dr-denis-rancourt-presents-his-findings-on-all-cause-mortality-ot.html) and accompanying 894-page book of exhibits (https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=129&name=2023_04_25_book_of_exhibits_of_expert_witness_denis_rancourt_national_citizens_inquiry).
Thank you for sharing this link. I just watched it for the first time today and it's absolutely shocking. The only conclusion I can come to is that this coercive, manipulative vax push was an intentional attack on the global population. I mean, what other explanation is there? Incompetence? Nah, I think not. This is sinister.
Also, is there any idea of how this will affect fertility and future population growth?
“ Also, is there any idea of how this will affect fertility and future population growth?”
Or for that matter the conservative vote due to the higher death rate in the elderly who were affected to a much higher degree. Sinister and prophetic. And all downwind of the reserve and its fiat currency that unhinged mankind from true accounting accountability and consequence in governance .. Covid was a fiat business plan netting these creeps more than a trillion fiat dollars that will now fund their killing machine into the foreseeable future. Makes me sick to see the fPhizer ads rolling in one after another. We have not owned a television for over 25 years, but I like to watch playoff sports and bring them in on my computer.. and the pharmaceutical ads are pretty much now one right after the other.
That's a deep rabbit hole. One I missed.
I'll be there a while.
Tnx
Children's Health Defense TV interview with Dr. Brian Hooker, about our study: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/new-study-finds-definite-causal-link-between-covid-vaccine-rollouts--peaks-in-allcause-mortality/
Thanks! Your research is extremely valuable and I am grateful to learn this information. Many of my elderly friends are continuing to recommend boosters for seniors, even though they are starting to recognize their harm and lack of efficacy for younger populations. The continued main stream warning to "Protect grandma" incentivizes people to get vaccinated. Hopefully, we will be able to recognize that "protect grandma" is not at all what these vaccines do.
In the history of the world, no crime has had so many accomplices.
Rebel News report about our study... excellent: https://www.rebelnews.com/scientists_find_definite_causal_link_between_covid_jabs_and_rise_of_all_cause_mortality
Just think about it, these con-artists have opportunistically/successfully turned the ‘annual/seasonal respiratory sickness season’ (the good old cold and flu season, wherever you live on the globe ) into a money-making profit through crap PCR tests (got us all testing for colds!) and acceptance of a pan coronavirus vaccine…
Many have been enriched via this scam, test manufacturers, testing labs, vaccine manufacturers, etc. AND basically they have deked us into testing for the cold! Ka’ching! The gift that will keep on giving as colds are never going away… 😑
...and I am speaking from a medical technologist POV who knows that our particular lab system made 50% more that year!
Excellent research and presentation.
Compliments to you and all on your team who contributed to this reporting. Thank you.
Thanks. Glad you are seeking truth.
This is stunning. The millions killed is so horrible as to be rejected by my mind, it will not accept these atrocities as true. It going to take some time to accept.
This isn't related to the Southern Hemisphere per se, but something I'm wondering about:
"The large gap between incorrectly inferred and actual population-level vDFR values probably occurs because of systemic avoidance of admitting the injections as a possible cause of death in frail and vulnerable patients."
WRT the gap between incorrectly inferred and actual, when someone dies, is their vaccination-status even recorded? This is entering my mind this morning (Sept 25th) because I ran the marathon in Montreal yesterday, and there were two cardiac arrests. Luckily EMTs were ready and resuscitated both, but of course I am wondering if they were vaccinated. I suspect, however, that even when they were taken to hospital, no one asked or recorded whether they were or not.
If this piece of data is not even collected, doesn't it make it impossible, or nearly so, to evaluate the effect these jabs are having?
Two years ago if I wanted to go a restaurant or shopping mall, it was demanded to know if I was vaccinated. Today someone can have a heart attack and if you ask if they were vaccinated its considered rude, intrusive, and worst of all, not revelant.
This is a great article! There’s a lot to unpack here
Thank you so much Denis. Presented, with a bit of translation, on my 4 French platforms.
Merci!
Thanks as always for your brilliant work and sharing Dr. Rancourt ! Sad the data is what it is …
As always Thanks for these data dear Dennis and Team, each one of them. Heroes.