This is brilliant, amazing work, thank you to all involved!
It would astound me if Peter Hotez was able to analyse anything at all. How he obtained a doctorate is bewildering, I can't help but feel he did not earn it.
It's great all this information is finally being revealed -- and it is maddening as hell that no one listened to what was already known 5 years ago! So much death and destruction, and who will be held to account?
Thank you, Denis, Joseph, and CORRELATION colleagues. While it is no doubt tedious to debunk the propaganda, it is essential to attack the bedrock lies that were used to emotionally manipulate the public into succumbing to experimental injections. I am still running into this roadblock with narrative-believers, including one dear real-life friend who was offended by my dystopian fairy tale (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/my-dystopian-fairy-tale-four-years) because she believes she lost friends and relatives to COVID because their countries did not have the injection early on.
Just finished reading Aaron Siri's recent book. What a cult, a pharma circus, vaccinology really is or has become. Strip them of the liability shields and reality would bite these shills quickly.
It's a very confronting read. Every time I thought he had exposed moral rock bottom, two pages on it sank even lower. I couldn't finish it without tears for how cruel humans in that realm have become and the risks they still expose kids to. The way they can lie to unsuspecting parents. How society still allows this to happen.
Thanks for the book list and for standing against such evil.
Gotta wonder how there would be a population to save after New York's 2020 mass casualty event.. looks like people were murdered on cue w lockdown orders & basis for models.
Models that are absurd since these were always decades old mRNA TRANSFECTION rebranded as 'novel vaccines' or newer "gene therapy" both lies to turn mop & bucket level bench tool used in every biotech lab & medical school into an IP cash cow and humans as experimental animals because lab rats are limited use for human biology!
Pieter Cullis pre-Nobel Prize speech explained if 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger lesson was lost & anyone doubted ALL non-self proteins cause immune disasters.. as criminal as lobotomy another Nobel Prize winner for Medicine!!
INSIDE VIEW - Here is one honest academic editor's reasons for not accepting our paper to be peer reviewed:
1. A departure from a neutral, scholarly tone
The manuscript frames scientific disagreement in a manner that is excessively polemical for an academic platform. This is evidenced by the use of charged and subjective language throughout the text, such as describing other researchers’ claims as “fantastic”, their models as “contrived circular self fulfilling theoretical exercises”, and their conclusions as having the “same value as propaganda”. Furthermore, the analysis dismisses alternative explanations (like viral evolution) as the work of a “magical and very cooperative virus” and qualifies counterfactual scenarios as “impossible” rather than highly improbable or inconsistent. This accusatory language unfortunately moves beyond scholarly debate and is not conducive to constructive peer review.
2. Unsupported causal assertions
The manuscript’s conclusion makes strong causal claims about the true drivers of excess mortality during the pandemic (e.g., “structurally imposed assaults by measures and responses”). While these are valid hypotheses for investigation, they are not directly tested or substantiated by the quantitative analysis presented within this specific paper, which focuses on critiquing a different model.
3. Non-standard academic format and self-promotion
The work is presented as a “report” from an advocacy organization and includes elements on the title page that are inconsistent with the standards of a formal academic publication. This includes a pre-formatted citation for the paper itself and multiple links to personal blogs, Substack, and other websites that fall under the category of self-promotion.
4. Reliance on a narrow evidentiary base
The paper continues to rely heavily on self-citation (over 1/4 of the references are to the authors’ own work) and reports from your own organization. While citing one’s own prior work is normal, this high percentage can create the appearance of a closed-loop argument rather than a broad engagement with the independent, peer-reviewed literature on the topic.
The Biomedical Collapse: How Modern Medicine Became a System of Dependence and Darkness
Modern medicine has entered absurdity. What began as a noble effort to alleviate suffering has metastasized into a machinery of control, dependence, disguised helplessness, endless sickness, “unsuspected” death and alienation—a system that treats life as a malfunctioning mechanism rather than a living, self-regulating organism. The biomedical model, once a symbol of progress, now stands as a monument to reductionism, dualism, and the death of meaning in science, a tremendous threat to humanity. A foundation of war against humanity, an open door for repression and psychopathic structures.
We’ve mistaken control for care.
We’ve mistaken data for truth.
And in doing so, we’ve built an insane system—one that abolishes the very profession it claims to protect.
I'd often read of Ioannidis as the most quoted scientist - along with the quote of his paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False".
Like so many others I assumed this was from a critical analysis or of the studies themselves. False assumption pave the road to hell!
This article gives a game away that I had already picked up on as running a usurp of evidence based science (even while claiming to be evidence based science - so as to keep lazy-minded assumptions reassured).
But in short as you have also stated within tour rigorous but perhaps over regulated presentation of the fact - predictive models set on false or limited predicates and parameters can be arbitrarily wielded as 'thescience' fronted by KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) to sustain systemic lies or heavily funded and securitised 'counterfactual assertions'.
Systemic lies are where a system is deemed to big to fail (not least but not only by its primary stakeholders), such that errors or corruptions set into anything foundation to its predicates has to be protected against truthful or honest correction. Hence social masking learns to turn a blind eye to evade attracting penalty or sacrifice set against perceived systemic risk.
Outsourcing responsibility as blame, pain and sacrifice runs as primary survival strategy in the human hierarchy of psychic or psychological distortions running as perceived gain of function or as protective against fear and threat of pain of loss. Such a hierarchy is organised around false needs and thus becomes increasing unworkable as compounded conflicts, debts and negatively charged denial of living practicality also felt as love, connection, reasoned sanity via honest communication and exchange. The System itself is the predicate of the hierarchy through the mindshare of its stakeholders of invested and defended identity.
Jesus said that Man is not made for law, but that Law is made for Man - referring to law as maintaining the conditions for the support of life as qualitatively productive or fulfilling. The fulfilment of Law is in alignment with our being - not in attempts to FORCE love, caring, or sharing that then frame perceived obstacle or opposition as evil to be eradicated or forever managed.
In the development of science as a means to uncover external reality in terms of laws that can then be predictively and pre-emptively applied or imposed to set planned outcomes, lies a systemic mapping out of a predictive control focus framed as a progressive good, and set against a past framed as evil, ignorant or dangerous and uncontrollable ideas, beliefs or worldviews. History - as told - proves this, while evil, ignorant or dangerous and uncontrollable histories are suppressed and denied.
The cultural shifts beneath officially purveyed histories are then markers for the mythic frameworks of an increasingly centralising means of systemic organisation - not just the means of production, but the knowledgebase of incentivised focus in scientific application, for there is little truly scientific endeavour that is not framed by funding as systemic credits against narrative-driven risk-models.
I've rambled somewhat. But the realm of modelling probabilities as an applied science is a technologism that finds support from quantum mechanics applied to relatively framed goals of 'moral' application.
This all feeds into collective guilting as a means to save us from projective fears that fund marketed scams for investor bubbles.
Mass migration to a virtual 'reality' is well underway but at a level few pick up on. For the 'science' that is set as authority has been usurped by a variant of its own rationalising substitution of predictive modelling framing expectation as an already fact or inevitable outcome.
We -for the most part -have learned or been trained to think this way.
Such that dissociation within a masking 'reality' is the normal by which Living is repackaged as threat.
Hence a bubble-reality defended against its own projections runs a modern variant of Plato's Cave.
Sorry for leaving an unrelated comment, but I think you need to give this a look see, especially after your 2020 science debate where you also killed the thermite narrative of 9/11;
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project has dropped a bomb! (Pardon the pun)
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Would you be interested in having a candid conversation pertaining to 9/11 and the evidence presented to court, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood, with their 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower cases against the NIST subcontractors for science fraud in their reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST Report?
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
This is brilliant, amazing work, thank you to all involved!
It would astound me if Peter Hotez was able to analyse anything at all. How he obtained a doctorate is bewildering, I can't help but feel he did not earn it.
It's great all this information is finally being revealed -- and it is maddening as hell that no one listened to what was already known 5 years ago! So much death and destruction, and who will be held to account?
Thank you, Denis, Joseph, and CORRELATION colleagues. While it is no doubt tedious to debunk the propaganda, it is essential to attack the bedrock lies that were used to emotionally manipulate the public into succumbing to experimental injections. I am still running into this roadblock with narrative-believers, including one dear real-life friend who was offended by my dystopian fairy tale (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/my-dystopian-fairy-tale-four-years) because she believes she lost friends and relatives to COVID because their countries did not have the injection early on.
Do we have the isolation and purification of this new bird flu?
Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-“H5N1” causation omitted
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7173052/
Microscope Proves , chicken flu, Fraud.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/chick-filet-virus-grips-wikistan?triedRedirect=true
More fakery from the wizards
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Says They ‘Copied & Pasted’ the Spike Sequence From the Chinese Government
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/moderna-ceo-we-never-had-access-to?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios
Do we have the isolation and purification documents of Covid 19 it appears it never existed?
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
They knew contagion didn't exist after the 1923 Lancaster Study, but they continued to push the fear narrative to keep a control on humanity.
https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1629159544348717061
ABOUT A YEAR INTO THE KANSAS FLU A STUDY CAME OUT CALLED THE THE
LANDMARK STUDY OF MILTON J.
ROSENAU, MD, "EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE MODE OF SPREAD OF INFLUENZA," WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL
ASSOCIATION IN 1919.
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Dr Jane Ruby explains the genocidal Globalist agenda a must watch
https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1876833307620409668?t=5RCGnvy0qXHVcikKzTpTNA&s=09
Once you recognize and understand the fraud of their pointless profession you know more than they will ever know.
And you know, by that illuminating insight, that you know more than they all know put together.
Just finished reading Aaron Siri's recent book. What a cult, a pharma circus, vaccinology really is or has become. Strip them of the liability shields and reality would bite these shills quickly.
Fantastic book! A gift.
My list of books:
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=123&name=3000_started_2022_10_29_blogpost_recommended_books_critical_of_the_virus_magic_bullet_and_vaccine_theories
It's a very confronting read. Every time I thought he had exposed moral rock bottom, two pages on it sank even lower. I couldn't finish it without tears for how cruel humans in that realm have become and the risks they still expose kids to. The way they can lie to unsuspecting parents. How society still allows this to happen.
Thanks for the book list and for standing against such evil.
When you think about how much money these fools paid for medical school:
It’s hilarious.
When you consider how many used their Covid funds to pay off their student loans:
It’s disgusting.
When you realize that they were required to inject themselves with the poisonous shots:
Well,
The devil is in the details.
Who had the Audacity to Give Them A Diploma?
That should be Investigated...
My favorite parts of Covid:
#264
Every time I listen to any and all of the Medical Professionals “leading” The Medical Freedom Movement
All I hear are cries for help.
As in:
“I can’t believe I ate the whole thing.”
You ate it chump.
Why have so few studies been published that simply compare the outcomes for the vaxxed and the unvaxxed?
As a biochemist pal of mine told me, “There is no profit in that.” Stunning statement, right?
Yes, the Graphics: Verticle/Horizontal Bar Charts would have been Clearest, Should Reflect, Support and Clarify the Text...
This was a Manifestation of an Academic/Bureaucratic: "Soup Sandwich"...
How much did the Taxpayer Pay for this "Study"?
Gotta wonder how there would be a population to save after New York's 2020 mass casualty event.. looks like people were murdered on cue w lockdown orders & basis for models.
Models that are absurd since these were always decades old mRNA TRANSFECTION rebranded as 'novel vaccines' or newer "gene therapy" both lies to turn mop & bucket level bench tool used in every biotech lab & medical school into an IP cash cow and humans as experimental animals because lab rats are limited use for human biology!
Pieter Cullis pre-Nobel Prize speech explained if 1999 Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger lesson was lost & anyone doubted ALL non-self proteins cause immune disasters.. as criminal as lobotomy another Nobel Prize winner for Medicine!!
https://web.archive.org/web/20080517050534/http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19991128mag-stolberg.html
https://rumble.com/v3q5vbq-2023-10-17-pieter-cullis-2022-study-hall-16-oct-2023-brief-twitch1953665426.html
INSIDE VIEW - Here is one honest academic editor's reasons for not accepting our paper to be peer reviewed:
1. A departure from a neutral, scholarly tone
The manuscript frames scientific disagreement in a manner that is excessively polemical for an academic platform. This is evidenced by the use of charged and subjective language throughout the text, such as describing other researchers’ claims as “fantastic”, their models as “contrived circular self fulfilling theoretical exercises”, and their conclusions as having the “same value as propaganda”. Furthermore, the analysis dismisses alternative explanations (like viral evolution) as the work of a “magical and very cooperative virus” and qualifies counterfactual scenarios as “impossible” rather than highly improbable or inconsistent. This accusatory language unfortunately moves beyond scholarly debate and is not conducive to constructive peer review.
2. Unsupported causal assertions
The manuscript’s conclusion makes strong causal claims about the true drivers of excess mortality during the pandemic (e.g., “structurally imposed assaults by measures and responses”). While these are valid hypotheses for investigation, they are not directly tested or substantiated by the quantitative analysis presented within this specific paper, which focuses on critiquing a different model.
3. Non-standard academic format and self-promotion
The work is presented as a “report” from an advocacy organization and includes elements on the title page that are inconsistent with the standards of a formal academic publication. This includes a pre-formatted citation for the paper itself and multiple links to personal blogs, Substack, and other websites that fall under the category of self-promotion.
4. Reliance on a narrow evidentiary base
The paper continues to rely heavily on self-citation (over 1/4 of the references are to the authors’ own work) and reports from your own organization. While citing one’s own prior work is normal, this high percentage can create the appearance of a closed-loop argument rather than a broad engagement with the independent, peer-reviewed literature on the topic.
Our paper is now at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17289481
Thank You Denis...
The Biomedical Collapse: How Modern Medicine Became a System of Dependence and Darkness
Modern medicine has entered absurdity. What began as a noble effort to alleviate suffering has metastasized into a machinery of control, dependence, disguised helplessness, endless sickness, “unsuspected” death and alienation—a system that treats life as a malfunctioning mechanism rather than a living, self-regulating organism. The biomedical model, once a symbol of progress, now stands as a monument to reductionism, dualism, and the death of meaning in science, a tremendous threat to humanity. A foundation of war against humanity, an open door for repression and psychopathic structures.
We’ve mistaken control for care.
We’ve mistaken data for truth.
And in doing so, we’ve built an insane system—one that abolishes the very profession it claims to protect.
https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/the-biomedical-collapse-how-modern-medicine-became-a-system-of-dependence-and-darkness/
Brilliant ~ thank you. I’m witnessing the repercussions on a daily basis.
Well done.
I'd often read of Ioannidis as the most quoted scientist - along with the quote of his paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False".
Like so many others I assumed this was from a critical analysis or of the studies themselves. False assumption pave the road to hell!
This article gives a game away that I had already picked up on as running a usurp of evidence based science (even while claiming to be evidence based science - so as to keep lazy-minded assumptions reassured).
https://library-of-atlantis.com/the-ioannidis-paper/
But in short as you have also stated within tour rigorous but perhaps over regulated presentation of the fact - predictive models set on false or limited predicates and parameters can be arbitrarily wielded as 'thescience' fronted by KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) to sustain systemic lies or heavily funded and securitised 'counterfactual assertions'.
Systemic lies are where a system is deemed to big to fail (not least but not only by its primary stakeholders), such that errors or corruptions set into anything foundation to its predicates has to be protected against truthful or honest correction. Hence social masking learns to turn a blind eye to evade attracting penalty or sacrifice set against perceived systemic risk.
Outsourcing responsibility as blame, pain and sacrifice runs as primary survival strategy in the human hierarchy of psychic or psychological distortions running as perceived gain of function or as protective against fear and threat of pain of loss. Such a hierarchy is organised around false needs and thus becomes increasing unworkable as compounded conflicts, debts and negatively charged denial of living practicality also felt as love, connection, reasoned sanity via honest communication and exchange. The System itself is the predicate of the hierarchy through the mindshare of its stakeholders of invested and defended identity.
Jesus said that Man is not made for law, but that Law is made for Man - referring to law as maintaining the conditions for the support of life as qualitatively productive or fulfilling. The fulfilment of Law is in alignment with our being - not in attempts to FORCE love, caring, or sharing that then frame perceived obstacle or opposition as evil to be eradicated or forever managed.
In the development of science as a means to uncover external reality in terms of laws that can then be predictively and pre-emptively applied or imposed to set planned outcomes, lies a systemic mapping out of a predictive control focus framed as a progressive good, and set against a past framed as evil, ignorant or dangerous and uncontrollable ideas, beliefs or worldviews. History - as told - proves this, while evil, ignorant or dangerous and uncontrollable histories are suppressed and denied.
The cultural shifts beneath officially purveyed histories are then markers for the mythic frameworks of an increasingly centralising means of systemic organisation - not just the means of production, but the knowledgebase of incentivised focus in scientific application, for there is little truly scientific endeavour that is not framed by funding as systemic credits against narrative-driven risk-models.
I've rambled somewhat. But the realm of modelling probabilities as an applied science is a technologism that finds support from quantum mechanics applied to relatively framed goals of 'moral' application.
This all feeds into collective guilting as a means to save us from projective fears that fund marketed scams for investor bubbles.
Mass migration to a virtual 'reality' is well underway but at a level few pick up on. For the 'science' that is set as authority has been usurped by a variant of its own rationalising substitution of predictive modelling framing expectation as an already fact or inevitable outcome.
We -for the most part -have learned or been trained to think this way.
Such that dissociation within a masking 'reality' is the normal by which Living is repackaged as threat.
Hence a bubble-reality defended against its own projections runs a modern variant of Plato's Cave.
Whoretez is such a prostrating pig
Wow, we are lucky to have this level of expertise being explained to lay people. And with notes that you can follow. Thank you!
Another well researched and easy to understand study. Thank you so much for keeping us sane 🙏
Sorry for leaving an unrelated comment, but I think you need to give this a look see, especially after your 2020 science debate where you also killed the thermite narrative of 9/11;
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project has dropped a bomb! (Pardon the pun)
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
I would love to hear your thoughts in the comment sections of my two articles.
Love your CV-19 work as always!
Added a comment, and as a Note.
Thank you for the resources you left in my article comment section, much appreciated.
May use your blog posts in an upcoming article about our interaction here and in the comment section of my "thermite is dead" article?
Your thought on Dr Mike Yeadon's take on the 9/11 evidence?
Dr Mike Yeadon getting stuck into 9/11 truth
The ex-Pfizer scientist is about to find the truth of the events on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-getting-stuck-into
Would you be interested in having a candid conversation pertaining to 9/11 and the evidence presented to court, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood, with their 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower cases against the NIST subcontractors for science fraud in their reports that made up the 10 000 page NIST Report?
No.
It's a pity. Dr Mike Yeadon was blown away, by the evidence presented. Pardon the pun.
Dr Mike Yeadon getting stuck into 9/11 truth
The ex-Pfizer scientist is about to find the truth of the events on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-getting-stuck-into
Who authorized "Case Closed"?
Greenyer?
What do you mean, who authorized it?
Read the article and listen to the presentation...
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/denis-rancourt-2010-death-blows-to
https://digwithin.net/2013/12/08/thermite/
The whole page is a farce and is over 12 years old and a lot more info has come out.
Here is some additional reading for you to do.
Thermite on 9/11 is DEAD.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?
Analysis of the Evidence at Ground Zero
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wtc-molten-metal-fact-or-fiction
The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers.
Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-mostly-empty-basements-of-the
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb?
Not everything that goes boom is a bomb.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance
I have had to publish numerous Graphs/Charts when Briefing Critically Important Information, i.e., Results from a Verifiable Study, with Controls...
Is it just me or do these Charts Look Like Bull Shit/Smoke & Mirrors?